Leaderboard

I would like to point out that there seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the Second Amendment at the basis of all the arms-bearing gun-owning rights arguments. "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." That is all one sentence. The keeping and bearing of arms is our right only because a well-regulated militia is necessary, not because we need to collect guns, or shoot things or people with them. The courts may have had different interpretations over the years, but the original intent was clear.